Be Quiet Dark Base Pro 900 Case Review

Dell Breadth 14 5410 laptop review: Restrained by missing AMD Ryzen pick

Enduring business organization heavyweight. Contrary to the tendency, Dell has used a somewhat thicker design for the Latitude xiv 5410 concern mid-range laptop, just it has included nice features like adept upgradeability and a large battery in return. These are good ideas, merely in the stop, the manufacturer slows itself down past not offer an AMD Ryzen 4000 choice. In addition, a very bad display is built in.

What the EliteBook is for HP and the ThinkPad for Lenovo, the Latitude is for Dell - Dell's business series. Inside the Latitude lineup, at that place's a clear gradation. The Dell Latitude 9000 and Breadth 7000 are the high-cease models. If you buy a Dell Latitude 3000, you're ownership a budget laptop for the role. The "golden midpoint" of the product range is the Dell Breadth 5000, the mainstream series from Dell. In that location are three unlike size classes, and the middle one is the virtually of import: The 14-inch course. The newest representative of this serial is the Dell Latitude 14 5410.

The configuration of our test device: An Intel Cadre i5, 16 GB of RAM, a 256 GB SSD, and a Total HD display. The street toll at the time of the examination: Around ane,130 Euros (~$1,335). Idue north this mid-price range for business laptops, it competes against the Lenovo ThinkPad T14, among others. Farther comparison references come from Dell itself: TheDell Latitude 5490 as predecessor and theDell Latitude 7410 every bit a more expensive premium model. Nosotros also include theLenovo ThinkPad T14s AMD in the comparing because it leads the top list of business organization laptops at the time of the test.

Memory

16384 MB

, DDR4 2666, 1 of 2 So-DIMM slots free, single-channel

Display

14.00 inch xvi:nine, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE NV14N4F, a-Si IPS LED, glossy: no, threescore Hz

Mainboard

Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Storage

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, 256 GB

, M.2 2280, PCIe NVme, 141 GB gratuitous

Weight

1.595 kg ( = 56.26 oz / 3.52 pounds), Ability Supply: 296 g ( = ten.44 oz / 0.65 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from unlike suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with like specifications.

Dell laptop with plastic case

Dell Breadth 14 5410

The Latitude 14 5410 is very similar to its direct predecessor, the Dell Latitude xiv 5400. The virtually important design change is the step away from night gray as a colour tone to silver gray. The changes compared with the Latitude 5490 are more pregnant. Among other things,Dell changed the swivel blueprint from the traditional acme-base version to the driblet-downwardly version. Furthermore, the display bezels accept shrunk, and the keyboard is now firmly integrated into the example of the Latitude. On the Latitude 5490, information technology was even so a separate office.

The case of the Dell Breadth 5410 is generally made of plastic that is reinforced with carbon cobweb and magnesium. The case's workmanship is perfect. There's nothing to criticize in terms of feel; the silverish surface is soft similar velvet and has a high-quality feel. The comparatively thick base unit of the Dell Breadth 14 5410 can hardly exist bent, and the display cover is too reasonably stable. On the other hand, pressure on the back of the display is quickly transferred to the LCD console. Important: The keyboard area can't be dented anywhere.

An aperture angle of 180° is still possible with the driblet-downwardly hinges. Opening the lid with one hand, however, is not possible. At least the hinges take a firm grip on the brandish in return, considering information technology only wobbles very slightly.

In comparing with the competition from Lenovo, the Dell Latitude 14 5410 remains quite a thick device, even if information technology'due south slightly thinner than the Latitude 5490. Especially theThinkPad T14s is naturally significantly thinner, merely even the normalThinkPad T14 offers less thickness. When it comes to weight, they all deport similarly.

In exchange, the Dell laptop is a scrap more than compact than the two ThinkPads, which as well manifests itself in narrower display bezels. The smaller dimensions are besides a big step up from the Dell Latitude 5490.

Size comparing

 Dell Breadth 5490-TD70X  Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00  Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00  Dell Breadth fourteen 5410-RJ80D  Dell Latitude 7410 ❌

Connectivity: The Dell laptop lacks a Thunderbolt three port

The Dell Latitude 14 5410 has only one USB-C port, but in that location are three USB-A ports in return. The USB-C port doesn't support Thunderbolt 3, though. In comparison to the Dell Latitude 5490, the VGA port has been omitted, and there'due south merely one microSD slot instead of an SD card slot.

Due to the alter in pattern, the ports are all placed on the right and left. On the Latitude 5490, they were however partially on the back side. Every bit a result, the USB-A ports on the correct in particular are very shut together.

SD card reader

Although the microSD card reader is less useful than the total-size SD menu reader - nothing has changed when information technology comes to the very expert transfer speeds. The card reader is faster than boilerplate in the benchmarks with the Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference card.

Communication

Like most modern business laptops, the Dell Latitude 14 5410 features support for Wi-Fi 6. In this instance it comes in the form of the Intel Wireless AX201. This 2x2 module delivered very proficient transfer rates in our test.

Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Wi-Fi half-dozen AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) i thousand 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.ane.3: Ø1368 (790-1450)

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Wi-Fi vi AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 1000 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1584 (1490-1642)

Dell Breadth 7410 Intel Wi-Fi six AX201; iperf3 Customer (receive) 1 chiliad 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.one.3: Ø1235 (1149-1323)

Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Wi-Fi half dozen AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf iii.1.iii: Ø1676 (1432-1793)

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 grand 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø740 (340-868)

Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.ane.3: Ø1030 (815-1184)

Webcam

28.seven ∆Eastward

29.1 ∆E

27.4 ∆E

26.7 ∆E

26 ∆E

20 ∆E

27.five ∆E

31.one ∆Eastward

26.1 ∆Due east

34.3 ∆Eastward

xix.i ∆Eastward

23.4 ∆E

30.3 ∆E

23.5 ∆E

24.2 ∆E

15.3 ∆E

26.4 ∆Due east

25.8 ∆East

2.3 ∆Due east

11.8 ∆E

22.eight ∆East

27 ∆E

30 ∆East

13.iv ∆East

ColorChecker Dell Breadth 14 5410-RJ80D: 23.83 ∆East min: 2.33 - max: 34.28 ∆Due east

Security

Dell hasn't skimped on security features: A fingerprint scanner, smart card slot, and Noble lock (instead of the more widespread Kensington lock) are available. The webcam likewise has a mechanical shutter for privacy. An infrared camera for Windows Howdy isn't on lath, though, and it's non optionally bachelor on the Dell laptop either.

Accessories

Autonomously from the 65-watt power adapter with a USB-C plug, no other accessories are included.

Maintenance

A total of eight Phillips screws and numerous clips have to be loosened before the Dell laptop's bottom encompass tin be removed. You should be careful when loosening the clips, as they could eventually too pause apace if too much forcefulness is used.

Commendable: Neither the RAM nor the Wi-Fi module are soldered; this looks partly different with the competition. In that location's also a free M.two 2242 slot for a WWAN module, and the antennas are available. If you add the 1000.2 2280 SSD, you become a well-upgradeable laptop. The battery tin can, of form, be replaced and the fan cleaned.

On the other manus, a minus point is the keyboard, which is function of the height of the base unit and is very difficult to remove. In this respect, theLenovo ThinkPad T14 proves to be more than modular than the Dell Latitude 5410.

Inside the Dell Latitude xiv 5410

Warranty

Dell isn't very generous when it comes to the warranty. The Dell Latitude 14 5410 is at the level of cheaper business organisation laptops offer just a one-yr period. This only includes a bring-in service, in which the Dell laptop must be sent in when in that location's a warranty claim. Warranty extensions and on-site service are available for an additional charge.

Input devices: The Dell laptop'southward keyboard is good

Keyboard

The keyboard doesn't quite take the total width of a total-size keyboard, which can be recognized by the rather narrow Enter key, amongst other things. However, the keyboard works quite well, considering the keys of the mainly used keypad area all take normal sizes. In addition, the arrangement of the arrow keys, for example, is also very pleasant.

The typing experience provided past the backlit keyboard is at a high level. The travel of the chiclet keys is deep (estimated at 1.eight mm), the keys have a pleasant, springy pressure level point, and the keyboard isn't loud either. The Dell Latitude 14 5410 is definitely suitable for productivity tasks.

Dell Breadth 14 5410 keyboard area

Touchpad and pointing stick

In contrast to the more expensive Dell Latitude xiv 7410, the Latitude 5410 still has a classic touchpad design. This means: In that location are dedicated buttons below the touch surface, and the touchpad tin can't be pressed in. In improver, information technology's quite minor past today's standards at ten x five.5 cm. The surface is made of slightly roughened plastic, which is non platonic for haptics. Nonetheless, the touchpad is however usable thanks to the Microsoft Precision touchpad driver, and the mouse pointer can be controlled precisely while gestures are implemented perfectly. You can also perform drag-and-drop operations smoothly with the dedicated buttons, even if they feel rather cheap in our test device.

Autonomously from the touchpad, the Latitude besides has a pointing stick with a black cap between the B, M and H keys. Unfortunately, it'southward not as precise as the Lenovo ThinkPad TrackPoint, and we also call up that the HP PointStick is ameliorate. In render, the Dell stick at least has the center button for scrolling, which is missing with HP. But the ThinkPad TrackPoint is too the gold standard here, because the mouse buttons for the pointing stick are a flake too narrow and too close to the keyboard on the Dell Latitude 5410. It's dainty that Dell has installed a pointing stick, only in that location'due south conspicuously room for comeback.

The Full Hd brandish is the weak betoken of the Dell Latitude 14

As is usual with business laptops, the Dell laptop also offers many display options; a total of five dissimilar 14-inch matte LCDs are available: One with Hard disk resolution (1366x768) and 4 with 1920x1080 pixels (Full HD). Hit: Compared to Lenovo'southward ThinkPad T series, the effulgence levels are lower, and 4K UHD options are completely missing as well:

• Hard disk, TN, 220 cd/m²
• Full Hard disk, IPS, 220 cd/k²
• Full HD, IPS, 220 cd/m², touch
• Full HD, IPS, 300 cd/thousand², low-ability
• Full HD, IPS, 300 cd/1000², privacy

Our test device contains the second option, the cheapest Full HD LCD. It delivers a terribly low effulgence value for today's weather: At an average of 218.7 cd/yard², it even just misses the already low mill setting. The display is clearly the Achilles heel of this Dell laptop, since Lenovo's competitors have significantly brighter monitors. Although the Dell Latitude 14 5410 also offers slightly brighter displays as an option, these autumn short of the ThinkPad displays every bit well.

	207 cd/m²	231 cd/thousand²	236 cd/thou²
	209 cd/one thousand²	235 cd/m²	231 cd/thou²
	191 cd/g²	221 cd/m²	207 cd/1000²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NV14N4F

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 236 cd/m² (Nits) Boilerplate: 218.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 235 cd/m²
Contrast: 1119:i (Blackness: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Colour six.xi | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.52 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.half-dozen.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll ane.6.three 3D)
40.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll ii.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll two.two.0 3D)
39.02% Brandish P3 (Argyll 2.ii.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33

	Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D BOE NV14N4F, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 B140HAN05.7, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1080, xiv.00	Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X AU Optronics AUO263D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 7410 AU Optronics B140ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 N140HCG-GQ2, IPS , 1920x1080, 14.00
Display		67%	-vii%	78%	70%
Display P3 Coverage	39.02	66 69%	36.28 -seven%	71.8 84%	66.8 71%
sRGB Coverage	58	96.8 67%	54.6 -6%	99.3 71%	97.9 69%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	forty.32	67.i 66%	37.48 -7%	72.4 eighty%	69 71%
Response Times		-5%	0%	23%	862%
Response Fourth dimension Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	46 ?(24, 22)	58.iv ?(28.4, 30) -27%	46.9 ?(23.6, 23.3) -two%	39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8) 15%	32.iv ?(16.4, xvi) xxx%
Response Time Black / White *	32 ?(18, 14)	26.4 ?(12.four, 14) 17%	31.2 ?(18, xiii.2) 2%	22.4 ?(12.4, 10) thirty%	15.two ?(6.eight, viii.iv) 52%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(90)				26040 ?(50) 2504%
Screen		51%	4%	28%	46%
Brightness middle	235	397 69%	227 -3%	388.6 65%	404 72%
Effulgence	219	394 80%	211 -iv%	365 67%	371 69%
Effulgence Distribution	81	90 11%	88 9%	82 1%	88 9%
Black Level *	0.21	0.two 5%	0.nineteen 10%	0.35 -67%	0.34 -62%
Dissimilarity	1119	1985 77%	1195 7%	1110 -1%	1188 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.11	3.6 41%	5.6 8%	4.04 34%	i.4 77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.half dozen	v.9 64%	22.four -35%	ix.ii 45%	3.ii 81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.52	3.9 29%	2.4 57%	6.four -16%	i.6 71%
Gamma	ii.33 94%	2.48 89%	ii.44 ninety%	2.three 96%	ii.13 103%
CCT	6680 97%	7090 92%	6506 100%	6957 93%	6480 100%
Color Infinite (Percentage of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	61.4 66%	34.5 -vii%	66.4 79%	63 70%
Color Infinite (Percent of sRGB)	58	96.6 67%	54.4 -6%	99.4 71%	97.9 69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1.ii		1.25	0.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)		38% / 47%	-one% / 1%	43% / 37%	326% / 204%

* ... smaller is better

The dissimilarity ratio of over i,000:i is not bad, only the Dell laptop'south display has to struggle with significant deviations when it comes to color quality - despite calibration with CalMan and the X-Rite i1Pro 2 colorimeter.

You shouldn't expect colour accuracy with this display. The Dell Latitude 14 5410 doesn't fifty-fifty cover threescore% of the sRGB color space. This LCD panel is useless forimage processing. Better colors could possibly be offered by the optionally bachelor displays with 300 cd/yard².

The Dell Latitude xiv 5410 is only near usable in the shade thanks to the matte surface. But this is not pleasant due to the low brightness.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to modify from one colour to the next. Wearisome response times tin can pb to afterimages and tin crusade moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ xviii ms rise
	↘ xiv ms autumn
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and volition be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.eight (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grayness
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24 ms rising
	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and volition be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the boilerplate of all tested devices (37.i ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks volition simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive optics may feel strain or headaches or even find the flickering birthday.

Screen flickering / PWM detected	1000 Hz	≤ 90 % brightness setting
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a effulgence setting of ninety % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM higher up this brightness setting. The frequency of thou Hz is quite high, so well-nigh users sensitive to PWM should non notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices practise not use PWM to dim the brandish. If PWM was detected, an average of 22039 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

One of the biggest advantages of this IPS brandish compared to the Hard disk drive TN display that'south also available is the very skillful viewing-angle stability.

Functioning: The Dell laptop would exist faster with AMD Ryzen 4000

Half-dozen different Intel chips are listed inorthward the processor section of the datasheet. Five belong to the current Comet Lake series (Cadre i3-10110U , i5-10210U , i5-10310U , i7-10610U, and i7-10810U), and the 6th processor is an older Whiskey Lake chip (i5-8365U). AMD options are not bachelor for the CPUs. But if you want a dedicated GPU, you lot tin besides purchase the Dell Breadth laptop with theAMD Radeon RX 640.

Dell has designed the RAM in a completely modular way. It looks as follows in exercise: Two And so-DIMM slots for up to 64 GB of DDR4 2666 memory. However, Dell sells the Latitude with a maximum of 32 GB ex works. The storage device is an M.2 2280 SSD, whereby according to the data sheet, models with a 2.5-inch HDD are also available.

Processor

TheIntel Core i5-10310U is a mid-range processor of the "Comet Lake" series that has four cores. These offer clock speeds betwixt ane.7 and 4.4 GHz. With Hyper-Threading, the CPU has viii threads, and in contrast to the cheaper i5-10210U, the vProenterprise feature is available. OurCPU Comparison list allows comparisons with other chips.

The cooling system of the Dell Latitude 14 5410 allows the processor to consume up to 50 watts for a brusque time. Later 30 seconds, it's limited to 35 watts, simply this functioning level tin can't be maintained in the long run - the CPU'southward temperature sensor measures a maximum of 98 °C (~208 °F). In the further course of the Cinebench multi-core loop, the consumption fluctuates between 23 and 15 watts, which means clock rates of 2.2 to 3 GHz.

Compared to theDell Breadth 5490 from 2019, the bottom line is: Functioning stagnation. TheThinkPad T14 with an Intel CPU is about as fast. Moreover, theThinkPad T14s with an AMD Ryzen 4000 processor is at a completely different level in terms of multi-core performance. Only in single-core usage is the i5-10310U competitive to some extent.

The processor is able to deliver its full performance even without a connected power adapter.

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	3050 Points ∼100% +102%
Average of class Role (323 - 3672, n=129, last 2 years)	1770 Points ∼58% +17%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	1511 Points ∼50%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	1441 Points ∼47% -five%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U (1192 - 1588, n=5)	1365 Points ∼45% -10%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	1271 Points ∼42% -16%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen seven PRO 4750U	468 Points ∼100% +vii%
Average of form Role (114 - 606, n=129, concluding 2 years)	457 Points ∼98% +iv%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	438 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U (411 - 438, due north=5)	428 Points ∼91% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Cadre i5-10210U	416 Points ∼89% -5%
Dell Breadth 7410 Intel Cadre i7-10610U	349 Points ∼75% -20%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	1346 (1300.6min - 1345.67max) Points ∼100% +75%
Average of form Office (196 - 1614, due north=128, final ii years)	774 Points ∼58% +i%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	767 (561.87min - 767.37max) Points ∼57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	706 (591.33min - 706.24max) Points ∼52% -8%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel Core i5-8350U	627 Points ∼47% -18%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U (499 - 767, north=5)	601 Points ∼45% -22%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Cadre i7-10610U	548 (512.63min - 548.19max) Points ∼41% -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Unmarried 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	181 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Part (75.8 - 230, due north=123, final ii years)	180.five Points ∼100% +six%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	177 Points ∼98% +4%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	170 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U (164 - 173.8, n=five)	169.4 Points ∼94% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	166 Points ∼92% -2%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel Core i5-8350U	142 Points ∼78% -16%

Blender two.79 / BMW27 CPU
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	863 Seconds * ∼100%
Average Intel Cadre i5-10310U (683 - 896, n=five)	838 Seconds * ∼97% +3%
Average of grade Office (302 - 3895, n=130, last 2 years)	834 Seconds * ∼97% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Cadre i5-10210U	823 Seconds * ∼95% +five%
Dell Breadth 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	812 Seconds * ∼94% +6%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel Core i5-8350U	705 Seconds * ∼82% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	367 Seconds * ∼43% +57%

7-Aught 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Breadth 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	4625 MIPS ∼100% +28%
Average of class Office (2059 - 5565, due north=131, terminal 2 years)	4471 MIPS ∼97% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	4467 MIPS ∼97% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	4269 MIPS ∼92% +18%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U (3615 - 4398, northward=5)	4121 MIPS ∼89% +14%
Dell Breadth 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	3615 MIPS ∼78%

seven-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	39649 MIPS ∼100% +117%
Average of class Function (4963 - 44266, n=130, final 2 years)	20755 MIPS ∼52% +13%
Dell Breadth 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	18310 MIPS ∼46%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	17699 MIPS ∼45% -iii%
Average Intel Cadre i5-10310U (15976 - 19935, n=five)	17406 MIPS ∼44% -5%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	17095 MIPS ∼43% -vii%

Geekbench 5.three / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	1237 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of course Office (431 - 1648, n=127, last two years)	1200 Points ∼97% +seven%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	1149 Points ∼93% +2%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	1122 Points ∼91%
Boilerplate Intel Core i5-10310U (1040 - 1128, n=six)	1100 Points ∼89% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	1017 Points ∼82% -9%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Flake Multi-Core Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	6444 Points ∼100% +67%
Average of course Office (1039 - 6889, due north=127, last two years)	4044 Points ∼63% +5%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	3854 Points ∼threescore%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	3731 Points ∼58% -iii%
Average Intel Cadre i5-10310U (2821 - 3854, due north=6)	3469 Points ∼54% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	3156 Points ∼49% -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.two / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	9.55 fps ∼100% +146%
Average of class Part (0.63 - 11.3, n=127, concluding ii years)	5.58 fps ∼58% +44%
Dell Breadth 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	4.55 fps ∼48% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	4.32 fps ∼45% +xi%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U (3.88 - 5.35, n=5)	four.32 fps ∼45% +11%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Cadre i5-10310U	iii.88 fps ∼41%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell Breadth xiv 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	69.ane s * ∼100%
Boilerplate Intel Core i5-10310U (60 - 71.iv, n=5)	65.2 south * ∼94% +half dozen%
Average of class Office (21.5 - 210, due north=129, final 2 years)	61.2 south * ∼89% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	60 south * ∼87% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	59.iii s * ∼86% +xiv%
Dell Breadth 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	57 s * ∼82% +eighteen%

R Benchmark two.5 / Overall mean
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U	0.806 sec * ∼100%
Boilerplate Intel Core i5-10310U (0.703 - 0.806, northward=5)	0.728 sec * ∼ninety% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel Core i5-10210U	0.719 sec * ∼89% +11%
Average of class Office (0.536 - 2.07, n=129, last 2 years)	0.698 sec * ∼87% +xiii%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel Core i7-10610U	0.657 sec * ∼82% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen seven PRO 4750U	0.616 sec * ∼76% +24%

* ... smaller is amend

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

48.84 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

767 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Assist

Arrangement functioning

Whether in everyday employ or in the PCMark benchmarks - there'southward null to criticize most system performance.

PCMark 10
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega vii, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	4890 Points ∼100% +23%
Boilerplate of form Office (1900 - 5933, north=115, final 2 years)	4428 Points ∼91% +11%
Dell Latitude 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	4348 Points ∼89% +9%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3888 - 4155, due north=five)	4018 Points ∼82% +1%
Dell Breadth 14 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	3980 Points ∼81%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Lite-On CA5-8D512	3932 Points ∼80% -one%
Essentials
Dell Breadth 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	9376 Points ∼100% +xiii%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega vii, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	9034 Points ∼96% +ix%
Boilerplate of class Office (4469 - 10650, n=115, final 2 years)	8816 Points ∼94% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8289 - 8659, north=5)	8453 Points ∼90% +ii%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8400 Points ∼90% +1%
Dell Latitude xiv 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	8289 Points ∼88%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	7540 Points ∼100% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	6877 Points ∼91% +vii%
Boilerplate of class Part (2994 - 9512, due north=115, last 2 years)	6684 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6151 - 6886, northward=5)	6601 Points ∼88% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6479 Points ∼86% +ane%
Dell Latitude fourteen 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	6399 Points ∼85%
Digital Content Cosmos
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5109 Points ∼100% +58%
Average of class Role (1270 - 5938, northward=115, last 2 years)	4075 Points ∼eighty% +26%
Dell Latitude xiv 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	3225 Points ∼63%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3021 - 3265, n=5)	3157 Points ∼62% -2%
Dell Latitude 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	3156 Points ∼62% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Calorie-free-On CA5-8D512	2998 Points ∼59% -seven%

PCMark viii
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	4640 Points ∼100% +33%
Dell Breadth 5490-TD70X UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G	3695 Points ∼80% +half-dozen%
Boilerplate of class Office (1275 - 5686, north=50, last 2 years)	3673 Points ∼79% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Lite-On CA5-8D512	3544 Points ∼76% +1%
Dell Latitude xiv 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	3499 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3469 - 3499, n=2)	3484 Points ∼75% 0%
Dell Breadth 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	3334 Points ∼72% -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega vii, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5570 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell Breadth fourteen 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	5098 Points ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Light-On CA5-8D512	5042 Points ∼91% -1%
Average Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4764 - 5098, north=2)	4931 Points ∼89% -3%
Dell Breadth 5490-TD70X UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G	4774 Points ∼86% -six%
Boilerplate of class Function (2201 - 5695, northward=46, last two years)	4530 Points ∼81% -11%
Dell Breadth 7410 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	4528 Points ∼81% -11%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3499 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3643 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5098 points
PCMark 10 Score		3980 points
Help

DPC latencies

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Spider web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

* ... smaller is better

Storage

With the Breadth 5490 predecessor, Dell withal used a slow SATA III SSD. In that location are no coin-saving measures of the kind with the Latitude fourteen 5410, simply the 256 GB SSD in the M.ii 2280 format is still not one of the fastest. Fifty-fifty the PCIe NVMe connexion doesn't help the Toshiba SSD, since the faster SSDs of the contest use this standard as well. In everyday life, all the same, the somewhat slower SSD shouldn't make itself noticeable.

	Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Lite-On CA5-8D512	Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G	Dell Latitude 7410 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	Boilerplate Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		31%	-42%	40%	43%	-one%
Write 4K	95.five	114.1 xix%	90.iv -5%	133.4 40%	108 thirteen%	109.7 ?(45.9 - 150, northward=viii) 15%
Read 4K	47.xiv	53.half dozen 14%	28.24 -40%	51.3 ix%	39.82 -xvi%	49.8 ?(32.1 - 61.8, n=eight) half dozen%
Write Seq	1251	1743 39%	433.vii -65%	1897 52%	2028 62%	961 ?(353 - 1613, northward=vii) -23%
Read Seq	1624	2092 29%	469.3 -71%	2202 36%	1826 12%	1562 ?(1126 - 1881, north=vii) -4%
Write 4K Q32T1	333.5	394.8 eighteen%	297.half dozen -xi%	384.nine fifteen%	570 71%	296 ?(138.8 - 412, n=8) -11%
Read 4K Q32T1	335.ii	372.6 eleven%	293.nine -12%	318.vii -5%	401.five twenty%	359 ?(143.i - 447, northward=8) 7%
Write Seq Q32T1	1234	2176 76%	534 -57%	2866 132%	3091 150%	1339 ?(326 - 2340, northward=8) ix%
Read Seq Q32T1	2247	3204 43%	531 -76%	3122 39%	2872 28%	2149 ?(1568 - 2422, n=8) -4%

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2247 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1234 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 335.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 333.v MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1624 MB/southward

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1251 MB/s

CDM v/vi Read 4K: 47.14 MB/s

CDM v/6 Write 4K: 95.5 MB/s

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

Sequential Read: 1837MB/south

Sequential Write: 700MB/south

Access Fourth dimension Write: 0.175ms

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read: 2379MB/southward

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write: 1196MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read: 1667MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write: 1281MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read: 575MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write: 342.3MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read: 48.72MB/south

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write: 103.5MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read: 2336MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Graphics card

TheIntel UHD Graphics 620 is an integrated graphics solution with 24 execution units and no dedicated memory that has been in use since 2017. The iGPU could bring a picayune more operation to the table through the apply of ii SO-DIMM modules, but in the end, this won't make much of a difference either. The iGPU is sufficient for video playback and for running very simple and older games but not for annihilation else.

3DMark eleven - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Radeon RX Vega vii, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	5399 Points ∼100% +187%
Average of class Office (599 - 11538, due north=126, last 2 years)	4055 Points ∼75% +116%
Dell Breadth 7410 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10610U	1951 Points ∼36% +4%
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Cadre i5-10310U	1878 Points ∼35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1757 Points ∼33% -half dozen%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 2006, due north=241)	1742 Points ∼32% -7%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U	1617 Points ∼30% -xiv%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Boilerplate of grade Role (3280 - 30980, n=103, last 2 years)	17021 Points ∼100% +89%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10610U	10023 Points ∼59% +xi%
Boilerplate Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 11437, n=222)	9232 Points ∼54% +two%
Dell Breadth 14 5410-RJ80D Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10310U	9010 Points ∼53%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U	8226 Points ∼48% -ix%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	8139 Points ∼48% -ten%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Radeon RX Vega vii, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	3593 Points ∼100% +213%
Average of form Role (449 - 8114, n=121, concluding 2 years)	2819 Points ∼78% +146%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Cadre i7-10610U	1338 Points ∼37% +17%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 1444, north=210)	1154 Points ∼32% +1%
Dell Breadth fourteen 5410-RJ80D Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10310U	1148 Points ∼32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Cadre i5-10210U	1033 Points ∼29% -10%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U	981 Points ∼27% -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Office (194 - 2886, n=107, terminal ii years)	949 Points ∼100% +154%
Dell Latitude 7410 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10610U	413 Points ∼44% +10%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 760, north=85)	384 Points ∼40% +3%
Dell Breadth 14 5410-RJ80D Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10310U	374 Points ∼39%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	358 Points ∼38% -four%

3DMark eleven Performance		2063 points
3DMark Deject Gate Standard Score		8787 points
3DMark Burn down Strike Score		1060 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		430 points
Assist

Emissions: The Latitude 14 5410 remains cool

Noise emissions

Dell leaves the fan continuously switched off in idle usage. In render, it runs and then loud under load that information technology near becomes abrasive. Moreover, the fan dissonance is quite high-frequency.

We couldn't detect coil whine in the Dell Breadth 14 5410.

Dissonance Level

Idle		24.9 / 24.ix / 24.9 dB(A)
Load		38.vii / 39.2 dB(A)
	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm altitude)   environment noise: 24.9 dB(A)

Temperature

Stress test (Prime95 + FurMark)

Fifty-fifty under load, the Dell Latitude 14 5410 stays very cool; not even 40 °C (~104°F) is reached. Interestingly, we measure the maximum temperature during the stress examination on the touchpad. Fortunately, the remaining areas of the palm rest stay absurd, though.

The form of the stress exam with Prime95 and FurMark is unspectacular. In the long run, the consumption is limited to xv watts, which still leaves you with clock rates of i.ane GHz. In terms of temperature, the CPU remains at around lxx °C (~158 °F). The TDP throttlingin the stress exam has no effect on everyday employ.

35.3 °C 96 F 38 °C 100 F 33.7 °C 93 F 36.ix °C 98 F 35 °C 95 F 33.five °C 92 F 28.iii °C 83 F 39.4 °C 103 F 27.4 °C 81 F

Maximum: 39.4 °C = 103 F Boilerplate: 34.two °C = 94 F

thirty °C 86 F 36.2 °C 97 F 33.4 °C 92 F 32.5 °C 91 F 35.1 °C 95 F 33.ane °C 92 F 28.5 °C 83 F 29.viii °C 86 F xxx.v °C 87 F

Maximum: 36.2 °C = 97 F Average: 32.1 °C = ninety F

Power Supply (max.)  36.4 °C = 98 F | Room Temperature 24.1 °C = 75 F | FIRT 550-Pocket

28.i °C 83 F 28.2 °C 83 F 28.1 °C 83 F 27.3 °C 81 F 27.ix °C 82 F 28 °C 82 F 26.ane °C 79 F 26.7 °C 80 F 26.6 °C 80 F

Maximum: 28.2 °C = 83 F Average: 27.4 °C = 81 F

28 °C 82 F 28.5 °C 83 F 28.1 °C 83 F 28.iv °C 83 F 27.4 °C 81 F 27.1 °C 81 F 27 °C 81 F 26.8 °C 80 F 26.7 °C 80 F

Maximum: 28.5 °C = 83 F Average: 27.six °C = 82 F

Power Supply (max.)  28.5 °C = 83 F | Room Temperature 24.2 °C = 76 F | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the boilerplate of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.two to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The lesser heats upwardly to a maximum of 36.two °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.six °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.iv °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can become very hot to the touch on with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.nine F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of like devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-eleven.half-dozen °C / -20.9 F).

Speakers

Dell hides the stereo speakers at the front of the bottom edge. Their volume is quite adequate, only the sound output has little rest. Bass is completely missing, and even the high notes lack that sure something. The ThinkPad T14's speakers are a chip quieter but more balanced in render.

The philharmonic sound port works perfectly. However, yous should showtime conciliate the "Dell Optimizer" software when connecting headphones, since it gives audio a reverb effect.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes tin can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Dell Breadth fourteen 5410-RJ80D sound assay

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | counterbalanced mids - only four.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - xvi kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - xvi.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this grade were amend, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The all-time had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (lxx.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on boilerplate 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on boilerplate 7.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (half-dozen.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - xvi kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.ix% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (v.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - xvi.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.two% divergence to median)
Compared to aforementioned class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% like, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were meliorate, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The all-time had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Energy management: Mega battery in the Dell laptop

Energy consumption

Dell has optimized power consumption very well. Specially the two Lenovo ThinkPads in our comparing have significantly higher consumption rates to some extent.

The consumption of 60 watts doesn't pose a challenge for the 65-watt power adapter.

	Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Calorie-free-On CA5-8D512, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Breadth 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 7410 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega seven, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS , 1920x1080, 14.00	Average Intel UHD Graphics 620	Boilerplate of course Role
Power Consumption		-27%	-12%	-20%	-44%	-17%	-26%
Idle Minimum *	2.nine	3.2 -10%	3.3 -14%	iii.7 -28%	five.7 -97%	3.79 ?(1 - 12.four, n=256) -31%	4.14 ?(1.7 - 9.9, northward=119, last two years) -43%
Idle Boilerplate *	four.5	6.one -36%	5.54 -23%	vi.two -38%	8.ix -98%	6.96 ?(two.eight - fifteen.7, n=258) -55%	7.45 ?(3.5 - 17.four, due north=119, last 2 years) -66%
Idle Maximum *	7.iv	10.4 -41%	half-dozen.59 11%	7 five%	11 -49%	8.78 ?(3.8 - 30, northward=256) -19%	nine.23 ?(4.7 - 22.5, n=119, last 2 years) -25%
Load Average *	34.6	45.6 -32%	42.4 -23%	43.2 -25%	38.two -10%	35.one ?(viii.i - 51.6, n=256) -1%	36.6 ?(eight.two - 85.6, n=117, last 2 years) -6%
Load Maximum *	sixty	68.6 -fourteen%	67.half-dozen -13%	68.6 -14%	40.2 33%	47.four ?(22 - 96.3, n=258) 21%	54.5 ?(viii.vii - 131, n=119, last ii years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

Charging time: 150 minutes

Despite the redesign: Dell hasn't changed anything when it comes to the characteristically big battery capacity of the Latitude 5000 series. The Dell Latitude 14 5410 continues to have an internal 68 Wh battery; this is significantly larger than the batteries in the ThinkPad T14  and ThinkPad T14s. No wonder that the Dell laptop can easily deliver battery runtimes of over x hours in practical use. In our Wi-Fi test at a 150 cd/1000² display effulgence, it fifty-fifty achieved 15 hours.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge Chromium 85)		13h 43min
WiFi Websurfing max. Effulgence (Edge Chromium 85)		10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 10min
Load (maximum effulgence)		2h 05min

	Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh	Dell Breadth 7410 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega vii, 57 Wh	Average of class Role
Bombardment Runtime		-30%	-9%	ix%	-12%	-24%
Reader / Idle			1556	1879		1307 ?(396 - 3537, n=34, last two years)
H.264	910	624 -31%	791 -13%		792 -13%	614 ?(292 - 1204, northward=41, final 2 years) -33%
WiFi v1.three	823	661 -twenty%	897 9%	661 -20%	612 -26%	542 ?(241 - 1715, n=118, last 2 years) -34%
Load	125	76 -39%	97 -22%	172 38%	127 2%	120.vi ?(54 - 359, n=68, last 2 years) -four%

Pros

+ robust plastic case

+ good typing experience

+ very enduring cheers to large battery

+ fast microSD reader

+ many ports and business features

+ loftier upgradeability

+ cool and quiet

Cons

- no AMD Ryzen option

- rather high weight

- bad display

- below-average mouse replacement

- Thunderbolt 3 only optional

- keyboard is not exchangeable

- curt warranty period

Verdict: The Dell Latitude 5410 is mainly attractive due to its battery

Dell'southward newest Latitude fourteen 5410 is an interesting concern laptop: It'southward placed betwixt Lenovo'south ThinkPad T and L serial in terms of quality, price, and configuration. Dell trumps with a significantly larger battery that even beats the ThinkPad T flagship, the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s. Even without a more efficient low-power LCD, the Dell Breadth 5410 is extremely indelible.

However, the Dell laptop's greatest force also has some downsides. Although the robust case is pleasantly meaty, the Dell Latitude 14 is comparatively thick and heavy. Simply in that location's again another advantage in render: The Dell laptop has a very proficient upgradeability; autonomously from the processor, there are no soldered components. However, information technology's incomprehensible that the keyboard is not exchangeable. At least it provides a adept typing feel, but unfortunately, we didn't like the touchpad and pointing stick that much.

Speaking of less expert: That's a good way to describe the much too dim and colour-weak display. We are also very disappointed that Dell doesn't offering an AMD Ryzen 4000 option. In terms of CPU performance, the Dell laptop can't agree a candle to the Lenovo ThinkPads and HP EliteBooks with AMD CPUs. At least Dell manages to brand the Latitude 14 5410 remain cool and quiet. On the other manus, we rate the short warranty period and the lack of support for Thunderbolt 3 negatively - the modern standard is only optional, merely in our opinion, it should be included by default.

The Dell Latitude 14 5410: Bombardment life and upgradeability are outstanding. Just you have to put up with a rather high weight and Intel Comet Lake in exchange.

Because all factors, we can recommend the Dell Latitude fourteen 5410 equally a work laptop. The restriction hither is that this only applies if battery life and upgradeability take a very high priority. If lower weight and high CPU functioning are more important, and then you are meliorate off with other laptop models from the ThinkPad or EliteBook series that come with AMD CPUs.

Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D - 2020-ten-25 x/25/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Connectivity

70 /80 → 87%

Games Performance

51 /78 → 65%

Application Operation

eighty /95 → 84%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

I was an agog reader of Notebookcheck's laptop reviews even back in school. After writing reviews as a hobby, I then joined Notebookcheck in 2016 and have worked on device reviews and news articles always since then. My personal involvement lies more with laptops than smartphones, with business laptops being the nigh interesting category for me. Applied science should make our lives and work easier and adept laptops are an essential tool for that to happen. This is why laptop reviews are not only my work simply are too my passion.

Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 506 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

I've been fascinated with applied science always since I got my very kickoff Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a modest footprint nonetheless amazes me. Learning to program fabricated my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to savor reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've fifty-fifty had the take a chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I'yard currently also interested in specializing in Coffee programming.

Please share our commodity, every link counts!

Benjamin Herzig, 2020-10-28 (Update: 2020-10-28)

dunnhourson.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-Latitude-14-5410-laptop-review-Restrained-by-missing-AMD-Ryzen-option.499370.0.html

Share this post